• About
    • Mission
    • Biographical Information
    • Contact Us
  • Defense
  • Energy
  • Logistics
  • Innovation
  • In the News
  • Follow
  • Like
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
September 10, 2008November 14, 2013Daniel Gouré, Ph.D.

← Back
← Previous Post
Next Post →

Rethinking The U.S. Strategic Posture

September 10, 2008November 14, 2013Daniel Gouré, Ph.D.

Research Study

Presented to the Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States

The term strategic posture generally is associated with the means and methods by which nations pursue their national interests — principally military forces and the way they are organized and employed. The link between national interests and strategic posture is determined by a nation’s strategic objectives. A nation’s most fundamental national interest is survival. Hence, its foremost strategic objective is to secure the homeland from attack. A strategic posture must first have adequate means and methods to ensure that objective. During the Cold War, the United States entered into a series of alliance relationships that extended the protection provided by its strategic posture to allies in Europe and the Pacific. U.S. national security policy also left open the possibility that nuclear weapons might be employed if other vital interests were threatened.

As technology has advanced, so too have the capabilities that constitute the strategic posture in a series of what historians term “revolutions in military affairs.” The invention of gunpowder, the internal combustion engine, electric current, nuclear fission and the integrated circuit all produced transformations in both the means and methods that characterized the strategic posture. Some new technologies led to the expansion of the definition of a strategic posture to include new domains for warfare, notably the oceans, airspace and outer space.

After World War Two, the term strategic posture came to be almost singularly associated with nuclear weapons and the long-range means to deliver them, as well as the infrastructure to build and support them.

What distinguished the strategic posture of the Cold War from that of previous eras was the acceptance by both sides of mutual vulnerability. The strategic posture was designed and built primarily to deter a nuclear attack, rather than to defeat one or otherwise prevail in the event of a conflict.

Click here to download full article as PDF.

Print | PDF | EMail

Find Archived Articles:

This entry was posted in Defense. Bookmark the permalink.
Sign Up For
LexNext Emails
1600 Wilson Boulevard - Suite 203
Arlington, VA 22209 USA
Phone: 703.522.5828
Fax: 703.522.5837
© 2023 Lexington Institute

Sign Up for LexNext Emails

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign Up for LexNext Emails

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.