• About
    • Mission
    • Biographical Information
    • Contact Us
  • Defense
  • Energy
  • Logistics
  • Innovation
  • In the News
  • Follow
  • Like
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
July 18, 2014Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D

← Back
← Previous Post
Next Post →

No Pain, No Gain: Pratt & Whitney’s F135 Engine Still Looks Like A Winner (From Forbes)

July 18, 2014Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D

The Pentagon’s new F-35 fighter didn’t make it to the Farnborough International Airshow this week, thanks to a last-minute problem with its Pratt & Whitney engine.  The engine problem looks to be a modest one — all the hundred-odd other engines being used in the fighter program proved to be in fine shape on inspection — but that hasn’t prevented hand-wringing about this latest setback in the “troubled” F-35 effort.  The truth of the matter is that both the airframe and the engine are doing fine, and senior Pentagon officials have closed ranks in defending the F-35 program.  In the case of Pratt & Whitney’s engine, they see a 98% availability rate and continuously declining costs on a system that greatly outperforms any alternative.  The friction-related problem that cropped up on June 23 is typical of what is found in the risk-reduction phase of military development programs; it should not distract Washington from the fact that the program is meeting all of its performance goals, and progressing steadily.  Once a long-anticipated production ramp-up occurs, prices will fall much further than the 45% reduction in unit cost already achieved.  I have written a commentary for Forbes here.

 

Print | PDF | EMail

Find Archived Articles:

This entry was posted in Early Warning Blog and tagged F-35, F135. Bookmark the permalink.
Sign Up For
LexNext Emails
1600 Wilson Boulevard - Suite 203
Arlington, VA 22209 USA
Phone: 703.522.5828
Fax: 703.522.5837
© 2023 Lexington Institute

Sign Up for LexNext Emails

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign Up for LexNext Emails

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.