Print
Email
>
>
The Secret Mission That Makes Subs Indispensible
Tags
2011 budget Acquisition Reform Aegis AEHF Afghan surge Afghanistan AgustaWestland airborne laser Airbus Al Qaeda Allies Alternate Engine Al-Yamamah American Enterprise Institute Ammunition Industrial Base APL Arms Control Arms Sales Arms Transfers Army Arrow Ashton Carter Babcock & Wilcox BAE Systems Bath Iron Works Bechtel BMDR Boeing Brown C-17 C-2 CAPE Carriers CENTCOM CH-47 Chabraja China climate change Cluster Bombs Cluster Munitions Conflicts of Interest Constellation CVN-78 CVN-91 cyber attack cyber defense cyber offense Cyber Threats Cyber Warfare DDG-1000 DDG-51 defense acquisitions Defense Budget Defense Business Board Defense Industry Defense Planning Defense Spending deficit Democrats & Defense deterrence Donald Rumsfeld Dong Feng DRS Technologies EA-18G EADS Efficiency Initiative EFV EH101 energy security Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle Export Controls F-16 F-22 F-35 Finmeccanica FMS FMTV force structure forcible entry Ford class Foreign Military Sales Free Trade Future Combat Systems GBI GCV General Dynamics General Mattis General McChrystal Global Hawk Global Strike GMR Greyhound Ground Combat Vehicle guns versus butter Handheld Manpack Radio Hapag-Looyd Helicopters Heritage Foundation High-Speed Rail Homeland Security Humvee hybrid warfare ICBM Inherently Governmental insourcing Intellectual Property Intelligence Community Iran Iran Sanctions Iraq Israel Jammer JFCOM Joint Forces Command Joint Heavy Lift Joint Operating Environment Joint Stars Joint Strike Fighter JSTARS JTRS KC-45 KC-X Kent Kresa Korea Larry Prior Linda Hudson Littoral Combat Ship Lockheed Martin Logistics Lynn M1 Mabus Maersk ManTech manufacturing Marine Corps Marine One Marinette Massachusetts M-ATV MH-60 Mid-term election Mine Countermeasures Mine Warfare Missile Defense MQ-9 MRAP NASA National Security Strategy NATO Navy NCADE Network-Centric Warfare Next Generation Jammer NGEN Nigeria NII Nimitz class NLOS-LS NMCI Non-Proliferation Norm Dicks North Korea Northrop Grumman NPR Nuclear Power Nuclear Shipbuilding Nuclear strategy Nuclear weapons Nunn-McCurdy O&M Operations and Maintenance Oshkosh Osprey P-8 Partnering Patriot PBL Performance-Based Logistics Persian Gulf Phalanx presidential helicopter Private Contractors Public-Private Partnerships QDR QHSR Rapid Fielding Initiative Ray Mabus Raytheon Rebalancing Reset RIMPAC Robert Gates Rocket Motors Ron Epstein RQ-7 Russia S-300 Samsung SBINet Scan Eagle Secretary Gates Shadow shipbuilding Sikorsky Soft Power solid rocket motor South Korea Space Tracking and Surveillance Satellite Space-X SSBN SSBN(X) Standard Missile Standard Missile 3 START Treaty Strategic Architecture strategic arms control Submarines Super Hornet Sustainable Defense Sustainment Taiwan Taliban Tanker terror terrorism THAAD Trade Deficit Trade Policy Trident Trident submarine UH-60 Unmanned Aerial Systems Unmanned Aerial Vehicles US Ports US101 USS Missouri V-22 Vertical Lift Virginia class weapons spending Wes Bush WGS Wideband Global Satcom William Perry World Trade Organization WTO Yemen
Recent
<< Previous
Next >>

The Secret Mission That Makes Subs Indispensible


The Pentagon has begun building its fiscal 2011 budget request, which will be sent to the Congress next February. 2011 is the year that production of the Virginia-class attack submarine -- the only class of subs the U.S. is currently building -- will ramp up to two boats per year. Prime contractors General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman have done a good job of cutting costs and labor hours on the Virginia class, but it still costs about $2 billion per boat to build them. So maybe you're wondering why they need to be produced at a higher rate when the Red Navy is long gone.

Part of the explanation is that Cold War attack submarines will begin retiring at the rate of three or four per year in the next decade, so the undersea fleet will start dwindling fast if we don't produce more subs soon. But the real reason the Navy needs to keep a lot of subs in the fleet is intelligence gathering. There are some things a submarine can do that other collection platforms cannot -- and I'm not just talking about tracking other warships. Consider the case of North Korea, a place where we need to monitor military developments closely.

North Korea is a hermit kingdom run by a brutal dictator, so developing human agents there is nearly impossible. That means our intelligence community needs to rely mostly on technical means to monitor developments. Aside from imagery, our most important intelligence product is electronic intercepts. But satellites are too far away to monitor many transmissions, and flying aircraft over North Korea is dangerous. Systems such as the EP-3 Aries II signals intelligence plane can fly along the coast, but like low-earth-orbit satellites, much of the time they are not in position to pick up critical intelligence.

That leaves submarines. They can remain submerged and undetected near North Korean areas of interest for months at a time, collecting electronic intercepts and transmitting them to remote locations for analysis. And while electronic signals typically travel in a straight line, natural phenomena along the coast like evaporative ducts bend and deflect transmissions so they can be intercepted despite intervening obstacles. So in addition to its sea control, maritime security, special operations and other more obvious missions, the Virginia-class attack sub is a vital cog in America's system for assuring global awareness of threats originating in places like Korea, China, Iran and Cuba.

Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D.

Return to Early Warning Blog
<< Previous
Next >>
1600 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22209
P: 703-522-5828 | F: 703-522-5837
©2009 Lexington Institute. All Rights Reserved.
Website designed by Borcz:Dixon | Powered by Agency of Record