Print
Email
>
>
Need For New Ballistic-Missile Sub Delays Development Of Virginia Replacement
Tags
2011 budget 2012 Election A&D A330 AA/AD ABL Acquisition Reform Acquisitions ADAS ADS Advanced Distributed Aperture System Aegis AEHF Aerostat AESA Afghan surge Afghanistan Aging Air Fleet AgustaWestland AH-1Z Air Force Air Force Modernization Air France Air Logistics Center Air Power Air Superiority Airborne ISR airborne laser Airborne Surveillance Airbus Aircraft Carrier Aircraft Carriers Airlift AirSea Battle Al Qaeda Alliances Alliant Techsystems Allies alternate engine Al-Yamamah American Enterprise Institute America's Future Ammunition Industrial Base amphibious warfare Anti-Access Anti-Access/Area Denial APL ARFORGEN Arms Control Arms Sales Arms Transfers Army Arrow Ashton Carter Asia Asia-Pacific Region AT-6 Austal Babcock & Wilcox BAE Systems Barack Obama Bath Iron Works Bechtel Bin Laden Biofuel Biohacker Biotechnology Black Hawk Blackhawk Bloomberg Bloomberg Business News BMDR Boeing BRAC Bradley Fighting Vehicle Britain Brookings Institution Brown Budget Control Act Budget Debate Budget Deficit Budget Drills Byron Callan C-17 C-2 C-5M CAPE Carrier Strike Group carriers CENTCOM Central Africa CH-47 Chabraja China Chinook helicopter CIRCM climate change Cluster Bombs Cluster Munitions Coast Guard Collaborative Defense Comanche helicopter Commercial Space Common Infrared Countermeasures Common Vertical Lift Support Platform Competitiveness Computer Sciences Corporation Concurrency Conflicts of Interest Congress Constellation Continuing Resolution Contracting Corzine Counterinsurgency Counterterrorism Crowdsourcing Crusader artillery CSAR CVLSP CVN-78 CVN-91 cyber attack cyber defense cyber offense Cyber Security Cyber Threats Cyber Warfare Cyberwarfare DARPA DDG 1000 DDG-1000 DDG-51 Debt Agreement Defense Acquisition System Defense Acquisitions Defense Budget Defense Business Board Defense Contractors Defense Cuts Defense Downturn Defense Drawdown Defense Industry Defense Planning Defense Procurement Defense Spending Defense Strategy Defense Weather Satellite System deficit Deficit Debate Deficit Reduction Democrats Democrats & Defense Depot Maintenance Depots Deputy Secretary Of Defense deterrence Dick Cheney Diversification Donald Rumsfeld Dong Feng Drone Drones DRS Technologies DWSS DynCorp E-2 EA-18G EADS EASE Economic Growth Economic Recovery Efficiency Drive Efficiency Initiative EFV Egypt EH101 EH-101 Elections Electronic Attack Electronic Warfare EMARSS energy security Energy Strategy Environmentalism EOTS EPA Erin Moseley Europe European Union Eurozone Excaliber Ex-Im Bank Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle Export Controls Export Financing Export-Import Bank F/A-18 F-15 F-16 F-22 F-35 F-35 engine F-35B FCS Fighter Sales Fincantieri Finmeccanica Fire Resistant Environmental Ensemble FMS FMTV Force Protection force structure forcible entry Ford class Foreign Arms Sales Foreign Military Sales Franco-British security FREE Free Trade Future Combat System Future Combat Systems Gaddafi Gadhafi GAO Gates GBI GCV GE GEN III General Dynamics General Electric General Martin Dempsey General Mattis General McChrystal General Odierno General Schwartz GISP Global Hawk Global Strike GMR Gorgon Stare Government Accountability Office GPS III Greyhound Ground Based Interceptor Ground Combat Vehicle guns versus butter Handheld Manpack Radio Hapag-Looyd Healthcare Helicopters Heritage Foundation HH-60G High-Speed Rail Homeland Security Homeland Security Air Fleet Hu Jintao Human Spaceflight Humvee Huntington Ingalls Hybrid Drive hybrid warfare ICBM IED Immelt Improvised Explosive Devices India Industrial Base Industrial Policy Inherently Governmental Insitu Insourcing Intellectual Property Intelligence Community IR&D Iran Iran Sanctions Iraq Israel ITT ITT Corporation ITT Defense J-20 Jammer Japan Jay Johnson Jay L. Johnson Jeffrey Immelt JFCOM JIEDDO JLTV Jobs Bill Joint Chiefs of Staff Joint Forces Command Joint Heavy Lift Joint Operating Environment Joint Stars Joint Strike Fighter Joint Tactical Radio System Jones Act JSTARS JTRS KBR KC-45 KC-46 KC-X Kent Kresa Kiowa Kiowa helicopter Korea L-3 Communications LAAR Larry Prior LCS LEMV Leon Panetta Libya Lieberman Lima Army Tank Plant Linda Gooden Linda Hudson Littoral Combat Ship Lockheed Martin Logistics Lynn M1 Mabus Maersk MANPAD ManTech manufacturing Marine Corps Marine Highway Initiative Marine One Marines Marinette Maritime Transport Mars Massachusetts M-ATV McNerney MDA MEADS MECV MH-60 Michael O'Hanlon Middle East Unrest Mid-term election Military Military Communications Military Depots Military Electronics Military Retirement System Military Satellites Military Space Military Spending Mine Countermeasures Mine Warfare Missile Defense Missile Defense Agency Missile Security Mitt Romney MQ-9 MRAP MRO NABCO NASA National Defense National Intelligence Estimate National Military Strategy National Security National Security Appropriations Bill National Security Review National Security Strategy National Taxpayer Union NATO Navistar Navy Navy Marine Corps Intranet Navy SEAL NCADE NDAA NETCENTS Network-Centric Warfare New START Next Generation Enterprise Network Next Generation Jammer NGEN Nick Chabraja NIE Nigeria NII Nimitz class NLOS-LS NLRB NMCI NMD Non-Proliferation Norm Dicks North Korea Northrop Grumman NPR Nuclear Deterrence Nuclear Power Nuclear Reduction Nuclear Shipbuilding Nuclear strategy nuclear triad Nuclear weapons Nunn-McCurdy O&M Obama Odierno Office of Air and Marine OH-58 Ohio Class Ohio Replacement Oil OMB Operations and Maintenance Osama bin Laden Oshkosh Oshkosh Corporation Osprey P.W. Singer P-8 PAA Pacfic Pacific Panetta Partner Capacity Partnering Patriot Pave Hawk PBL Pentagon Pentagon Budget Pentagon Cuts Pentagon Spending PEO Soldier Perchlorate Performance Based Logistics Performance-Based Logistics Persian Gulf Phalanx Phased Adaptive Approach Phased Adaptive Architecture PLA Navy Pratt & Whitney Predator Presidential Helicopter Private Contractors Public Interest Research Group Public-Private Partnerships QDR QHSR Rapid Equipping Force Rapid Fielding Initiative Rare Earth Ray Mabus Raytheon Rebalancing Reconnaissance Helicopter Reelection REF Republicans Reset RFI Richard Aboulafia RIMPAC Robert Gates Robert O. Work Rocket Industry Rocket Motors Rolls-Royce Romney Ron Epstein RPV RQ-170 RQ-4 RQ-7 Russia S-300 SAIC Samsung Saxby Chambliss SBINet SBIRS Scan Eagle Secretary Donley Secretary Gates Sentinel Sequestration Shadow shipbuilding Sikorsky Situational Awareness SLAMRAAM Smart Defense Initiative Soft Power Solar Electric Propulsion Soldier As A System Soldier Equipment solid rocket motor SOSCOE South Korea Space Based Infared System Space Launch Space Shuttle Space Tracking and Surveillance Satellite SpaceX Space-X Special Operations Special Operations Forces SSBN SSBN(X) Standard Missile Standard Missile 3 START START Treaty Stealth Helicopter Steel Strait of Hormuz Strategic Architecture strategic arms control Strategic Arms Treaty Stryker submarine Submarines Subsidies Super Committee Super Hornet Supply Chain Sustainable Defense Sustainment Switchblade T-38 Trainer Tactical Communications Taiwan Taliban Tanker Tankers Tea Party Teal Group terror terrorism Testing Requirements Textron THAAD The Economist Theater Express Trade Deficit Trade Policy Trade Subsidies Trident Trident submarine Troop Reduction U.S. Manufacturing U.S. Strategy U-2 UAV UAVs UH-1Y UH-60 United Kingdom United Technologies Unmanned Aerial Systems Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Unmanned Aircraft Urgent Operational Needs US Ports US101 USS Missouri V-22 V-22 Osprey Vertical Lift Virginia-class Submarine War On Terror Weapons Programs Weapons Spending Wes Bush WGS White House Transparency Measure Wichita Wideband Global Satcom Wikileaks William Perry WIN-T World Trade Organization WTO Yemen
Recent
<< Previous
Next >>

Need For New Ballistic-Missile Sub Delays Development Of Virginia Replacement


Here's a paradox from the world of naval shipbuilding. The Navy's need to begin development of a new ballistic-missile submarine in 2012 virtually guarantees that the Virginia-class attack sub will stay in production through 2025 -- even though Virginia has been disqualified as a candidate for the ballistic-missile mission. Conventional wisdom has it that when the Navy tries to buy too many classes of warship at the same time, something ends up getting squeezed out of the budget. In the case of the Virginia class, though, the opposite will happen. The boat will need to stay in production longer than originally planned, because scarce technical talent will be too tied up designing the new ballistic-missile sub to begin work on a Virginia replacement.

Aside from a handful of specialized undersea warships, the Navy operates two types of submarines: ballistic-missile submarines that provide secure retaliatory forces in support of nuclear deterrence, and smaller attack subs that collect intelligence and carry out a diverse array of combat missions (like anti-submarine warfare). The fleet of ballistic-missile subs currently consists of 14 Trident boats, each carrying two dozen long-range missiles. The attack-sub fleet consists of older Los Angeles-class and Seawolf-class boats, plus the newer Virginia class. The Navy had planned to buy 30 Virginia-class boats, and then shift to a more capable successor. But that would require tapping technical communities to design a new attack sub, and right now those communities look likely to be fully absorbed in designing the Trident replacement during the coming decade. So the Navy will probably have to buy 40 Virginias at the rate of two per year before a successor attack sub becomes available.

The Navy is planning to ramp up production of Virginias from one boat to two boats per year beginning in fiscal 2011. The ramp-up is overdue, because cold-war-era Los Angeles attack subs will soon begin retiring from the fleet at the rate of three or four per year. As those retirements progress, the number of attack subs in the fleet will decline to a mere 43 in 2028 -- barely half the number that the Navy operated during the Reagan era. That may not be enough to cover the world, given the amount of time taken away from operational missions for maintenance, transit and training. But because the Navy waited so long to ramp up construction of attack subs and the design of a Trident replacement can't be delayed, it will have to keep the Virginia class in production for many more years -- at the rate of two per year -- to prevent attack-sub numbers from falling even lower than 43.

That's one reason why the service has decided to add back money for a second Virginia that was missing from the shipbuilding plan in 2015: any slowing in the rate of attack-sub production drives the size of the future fleet below 43 boats, which is too low to meet global commitments. In theory, a further drop could be avoided while still developing a Virginia-class replacement as planned. In practice, though, the submarine design community can only design one class of vessel at a time, and each design takes at least half a dozen years to complete. With Tridents likely to become even more important to nuclear deterrence in the years ahead, timely development of a replacement ballistic-missile sub has first claim on the design community. So it's a safe bet that Virginia-class attack subs will still be under construction 15 years from now, because it will take that long to get through the Trident replacement project and then move on to developing a new attack sub.

Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D.

Return to Early Warning Blog
<< Previous
Next >>
1600 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22209
P: 703-522-5828 | F: 703-522-5837
©2009 Lexington Institute. All Rights Reserved.
Website designed by Borcz:Dixon | Powered by Agency of Record