Print
Email
>
>
Korea: If War Comes
Recent
Tags
14 Ohio-class SSBNs 2011 budget 2012 Election 450 Minuteman III ICBMs 50/50 737 787 787 Dreamliner A&D A2/AD A320 A330 AA/AD AAV ABL Abram Acquisition Reform Acquisitions ADAS ADS Advanced Distributed Aperture System Advanced Hawkeye AEA Aegis AEHF Aerostat AESA Afghan surge Afghanistan Agility Aging Air Fleet AgustaWestland AH-1Z Air Defense Air Dominance Air Force Air Force Modernization Air France Air Logistics Center Air Logistics Centers Air Mobility Air National Guard Air Power Air Superiority Airborne ISR airborne laser airborne surveillance Airbus Aircraft Carrier Aircraft Carriers Airlift Airpower AirSea Battle Al Qaeda Alliances Alliant Techsystems Allies Alternate Engine Al-Yamamah American Enterprise Institute America's Future Ammunition Industrial Base Amphibious amphibious warfare AMPV AMT Anniston Anti-Access Anti-Access/Area Denial Apache APL ARFORGEN ARG Armored Vehicles Arms Control Arms Sales Arms Transfers Army Arnold Punaro Arrow Ashton Carter Asia Asia- Pacific Asia-Pacfic Pivot Asia-Pacific Asia-Pacific Pivot Asia-Pacific Region Asia-Pacific Strategy Assymetric Warfare AT-6 ATK AUSA Austal Australia AW609 AWACS B-52 Babcock & Wilcox BAE Systems BAE-EADS bail out Bain Capital BAMS Barack Obama Barbero Bath Iron Works BBP BCA Bechtel Beechcraft Benghazi Better Buying Power Bin Laden Bio-Engineering Biofuel Biohacker Biotechnology Black Hawk Blackhawk Bloomberg Bloomberg Business News BMD BMDR Boeing Bombers Boston BRAC Bradley Bradley Fighting Vehicle Britain British Military British Ministry of Defense Brookings Institution Brown budget Budget Control Act Budget Debate Budget Deficit Budget Drills Byron Callan C-130 C-17 C-2 C-5M CAPE Cargo Containers Cargo Screening Carrier Strike Group carriers CENTCOM Central Africa CH-47 Chabraja Chief Executive Officer China Chinook helicopter Chuck Hagel CIRCM climate change closing tank plant Cluster Bombs Cluster Munitions Coast Guard Collaborative Defense Comanche helicopter Commercial Space Common Infrared Countermeasures Common Vertical Lift Support Platform Communications Competitive Engagement Competitiveness Computer Sciences Corporation Concurrency Conflicts of Interest Congress Consolidation Constellation Contingency Support Contractors Continuing Resolution Contract Services Contracting Core Corzine cost Counterinsurgency Counterterrorism CRH Critical Enablers Critical Infrastructure Crowdsourcing Crusader artillery CSAR CTF Customer Pay CVLSP CVN CVN-78 CVN-91 Cyber cyber attack cyber defense cyber offense Cyber Security Cyber Threats Cyber Warfare Cybersecurity Cyberwar Cyberwarfare DARPA DB-110 DCAA DDG 1000 DDG-1000 DDG-51 debt Debt Agreement Defense Acquisistions Defense Acquisition System Defense Acquisitions Defense Budget Defense Business Board Defense Contract Requirements Defense Contractors Defense Contracts Defense Cuts Defense Downturn Defense Drawdown defense funding cut Defense Industrial Base Defense Industry Defense Planning Defense Priorities Defense Procurement Defense Sector Defense Spending Defense Stocks Defense Strategy Defense Weather Satellite System deficit Deficit Debate Deficit Reduction Delta Delta Air LInes Democrats Democrats & Defense Department of Defense Depot Depot Maintenance Depots Deputy Secretary Of Defense deterrence Detroit Arsenal Tank Plant DHS Dick Cheney Diversification DLA DOJ Donald Rumsfeld Dong Feng Dreamliner Drive down cost Drone Drones DRS Technologies DWSS DynCorp E-2 E-2D E-3 EA-18G EADS EASE Economic Growth Economic Recovery Economy Efficiency Drive Efficiency Initiative EFV Egypt EH101 EH-101 Elections Electric Grid Electric Power Grid Electronic Attack Electronic Warfare EMARSS energy security Energy Strategy Environmentalism EOTS EPA EPAA Erin Moseley ERP EU euro crisis Europe European Union eurozone EW Excaliber Exelis Ex-Im Bank Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle Export Controls Export Financing Export-Import Bank F/A-18 F117 F-15 F-16 F-22 F-35 F-35 engine F-35B FAA Fairfax County Fajr 5 rocket FCS Federal Reserve Fighter Sales Fincantieri Finmeccanica Fire Fighting Fire Resistant Environmental Ensemble fiscal cliff FMS FMTV Force Posture Force Protection Force Readiness Force Structure forcible entry Ford class Foreign Arms Sales Foreign Military Sales Forest Service Franco-British security FREE free speech Free Trade Future Combat System Future Combat Systems future warfare Gaddafi Gadhafi GAO Gates Gaza GBI GCV GE GEN III General Dynamics General Electric General Martin Dempsey General Mattis General McChrystal General Odierno General Schwartz GFE GISP Global Hawk Global Influence Global Strike Global Zero GMD GMR Goldman Sachs Gordon England Gorgon Stare Government Accountability Office GPS III Great Britain Greece Greyhound Ground Based Interceptor Ground Combat Vehicle Ground Mobile Radio Gun Control guns versus butter Hagel Hal Rogers Hamas Handheld Manpack Radio Hapag-Looyd HASC Hawker Beechcraft Hawkeye Healthcare Helicopters Heritage Foundation HH-60G High-Speed Rail HMS Homeland Defense Homeland Security Homeland Security Air Fleet Hu Jintao Human Spaceflight Humvee Huntington Ingalls Hybrid Drive Hybrid Strategies Hybrid Threat Hybrid Threats hybrid warfare Hypersonic Hypoxia ICBM IED Immelt Improvised Explosive Devices Incremental Funding India Industrial Base Industrial Policy Inherently Governmental Insitu Insourcing installations abroad Integrator Intellectual Property Intelligence Community IR&D Iran Iran Sanctions Iraq Iron Dome ISR Israel IT Providers ITT ITT Corporation ITT Defense J-20 Jacksonville Jammer Jammers Japan Jay Johnson Jay L. Johnson Jeffrey Immelt Jet Engines JFCOM JIEDDO JLENS JLTV Jobs Bill Joint Chiefs of Staff Joint Forces Command Joint Heavy Lift Joint Operating Environment Joint Stars Joint Strike Fighter Joint Tactical Radio System Jones Act JSTARS JTRS KBR KC-45 KC-46 KC-X Kent Kresa Kiowa Kiowa helicopter Korea L-3 Communications LAAR Lake City Larry Prior LAS LCAAP LCS LEMV Leon Panetta Libya Lieberman Life Cycle Costs Light Air Support Lima Lima Army Tank Plant Linda Gooden Linda Hudson lithium-ion batteries Littoral Combat Ship Lockheed Martin Logistics Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence Vehicle (LEMV) LRS LUH Lynn M1 M-1 Mabus Maersk maintenance MANPAD ManTech manufacturing Marillyn Hewson Marine Corps Marine Highway Initiative Marine One Marines Marinette Maritime Transport Mars Massachusetts M-ATV McNerney MDA MEADS MECV merger MEU MH-60 Michael O'Hanlon Middle East Middle East Unrest Mid-term election Military Military Communications military cuts Military Depots Military Electronics Military Pension Military Preparedness Military Readiness Military Retirement System Military Satellites Military Space Military Spending Military Strategy Military Vote Mine Countermeasures Mine Warfare Missile Defense Missile Defense Agency Missile Security Missile Tracking Satellite Mitt Romney MMPDS Modernization MPC MQ-9 MRAP MRC MRO Multiyear Contract Multiyear Procurement MV-22 NABCO NASA National Defense National Guard National Intelligence Estimate National Military Strategy National Research Council National Security National Security Appropriations Bill National Security Review National Security Strategy National Taxpayer Union NATO Navistar Navy Navy Acquisitions Navy Marine Corps Intranet Navy SEAL Navy SEALS NCADE NDAA Net Assessment NETCENTS Network-Centric Warfare Networks New Mexico New START Next Generation Enterprise Network Next Generation Jammer NGEN Nick Chabraja NIE NIFC-CA Nigeria NII Nimitz class NLOS-LS NLRB NMCI NMD Non-Proliferation Norm Dicks North Korea Northrop Grumman November Election NPR NRO NSA nuclear Nuclear Detection Nuclear Deterrence Nuclear Energy Nuclear Power Nuclear Reduction Nuclear Shipbuilding Nuclear strategy nuclear triad Nuclear Weapons Nunn-McCurdy O&M Obama Obamacare Odierno Office of Air and Marine OH-58 Ohio Ohio Class Ohio Replacement Oil O'Keefe OMB Operations and Maintenance Osama bin Laden Oshkosh Oshkosh Corporation Osprey Outsourcing overheating P.W. Singer P-8 P-8A PAA Pacfic Pacific Pakistan Panetta Partner Capacity Partnering Patriot Pave Hawk PBL Pentagon Pentagon Budget Pentagon Cuts Pentagon Spending PEO Soldier Perchlorate Performance Based Logistics Performance-Based Agreement Performance-Based Logistics Persian Gulf Phalanx Phased Adaptive Approach Phased Adaptive Architecture Pilot Training PLA Navy Poseidon Pratt & Whitney Predator Presidential Helicopter Private Contractors Procurement PSSD PTSS Public Interest Research Group Public Private Partnership Public-Private Partnership Public-Private Partnerships Pyongyang QDR QHSR Raider Rapid Equipping Force Rapid Fielding Initiative Rare Earth Ray Mabus Raytheon Readiness Reaper Rebalancing Reconnaissance Helicopter Reelection REF Regulatory Burden Republicans Reset Restart F- 22 RFI Richard Aboulafia Rifleman RIMPAC Rivet Joint RMD 802 Robert Gates Robert O. Work Robert Stevens Rocket Industry Rocket Motors Rocketdyne Rolls-Royce Romney Ron Epstein RPV RQ-170 RQ-4 RQ-7 Rules of Engagement Russia S-300 S-97 SAIC Samsung satellite Satellites Saxby Chambliss SBINet SBIRS Scan Eagle Seapower Secretary Donley Secretary Gates Section 808 Sentinel Sequestration Shadow ship building Shipbuilding Should Cost Methodology Sierra Nevada Sierra Nevada Corporation Sikorsky Situational Awareness SLAMRAAM SM-3 Smart Defense Smart Defense Initiative SOF Soft Power Solar Electric Propulsion Soldier As A System Soldier Equipment solid rocket motor SOSCOE South Korea Space Space Based Infared System space disaggregation Space Launch Space Shuttle Space Tracking and Surveillance Satellite SpaceX Space-X Special Operations Special Operations Forces SSBN SSBN(X) Standard Missile Standard Missile 3 START START Treaty Stealth Helicopter Steel Strait of Hormuz Strategic Architecture strategic arms control Strategic Arms Treaty Strategic Review Stryker STUAS submarine Submarines Subsidies Super Committee Super Galaxay Super Hornet Supply Chain Supply Chain Management Sustainable Defense Sustainment swing states Switchblade Syria T-38 T-38 Trainer Tactical Communications Taiwan Taliban Tanker Tankers Tea Party Teal Group Technical Data terror terrorism Testing Requirements Textron THAAD The Economist Theater Express Tiltrotor Tilt-rotor TLSP Trade Deficit Trade Policy Trade Subsidies Transformation Trident Trident submarine Troop Reduction Turkey Tysons Corner U.K. U.N. Investigation U.S. Army U.S. embassy in Cairo U.S. Manufacturing U.S. Navy U.S. Strategy U-2 UAS UAV UAVs UCLASS UH-1Y UH-60 UK United Kingdom United Technologies Unmanned Aerial System Unmanned Aerial Systems Unmanned Aerial Vehicles unmanned air systems (UASs) Unmanned Aircraft Urgent Operational Needs US Ports US101 USFS USS Missouri Utah V-22 V-22 Osprey Vertical Lift Virginia Virginia-class submarine WAPS war War On Terror WARN Washington Weapons Programs Weapons Spending Wes Bush WGS White House Transparency Measure Wichita Wideband Global Satcom Wikileaks William Perry WIN-T World Trade Organization WTO Yemen York
<< Previous
Next >>

Korea: If War Comes


The chance exists that the Korean peninsula will be engulfed in war for the first time in nearly 60 years. North Korea’s deliberate sinking of a South Korean warship may have lit the fuse. In response, quite naturally, the Republic of Korea has cut off economic relations with its northern neighbor and called on Pyongyang to apologize. The United States will be seeking a U.N. resolution imposing additional sanctions on the North. In response, the North has placed its military on alert and is threatening to initiate hostilities if it, the aggressor, is subjected to any punishment for its transgression.

If the history of relations with North Korea is a predictor, war on the Korean peninsula is unlikely. This history has the North using violence to press its financial and economic interests and its victims, including the United States, after a moment of finger wagging and a lot of strong talk, basically engage the regime in the North in new rounds of negotiations. However, sometimes even the best laid plans by demented dictators run awry. The result then is war.

If war comes in Korea, will the U.S. military be prepared? It is a military that has expended enormous energy, huge amounts of treasure, way too much precious blood and nearly nine years fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq. Much of the senior leadership has had virtually no time to think about or practice the higher arts of combined arms combat against a well-armed, well-organized foe. The Commandant of the Marine Corps, General Conway, has lamented for several years now that his Marines have been unable to practice amphibious operations. The Army has been using its training centers to prepare brigades heading for Iraq and Afghanistan for the challenges of irregular warfare. It has been a long time since anyone in the Army practices for a combined-arms operation. The Air Force has invested in a generation of unmanned aerial systems for surveillance purposes that will be sitting ducks in the intense air defense environment over North Korea. The Navy alone may be able to handle the mission, particularly given its additional investments in its Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense system with the Standard Missile.

There is little doubt that South Korea and its allies, most importantly the United States, could eventually defeat North Korea. But the challenge today would be greater than in the past. Even if the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had ended yesterday, the U.S. Army and Marine Corps will need at least two years of peace to reset itself for another conflict, and even then only if it gets billions of dollars to repair and refurbish damaged and worn out equipment. With two conflicts ongoing and the military trying to withdraw from Iraq while swinging forces and equipment into Afghanistan, it is not clear how swiftly the U.S. would be able to reinforce its 28,000 troops in Korea.

This means that the U.S. would have to rely on air and sea power. Suddenly all those so-called Cold War relics such as aircraft carriers, Aegis cruisers and destroyers, B-52, B-1 and B-2 bombers and the much maligned F-22 stealth fighter would play a central role in war.

North Korea is perhaps the quintessential hybrid threat that defense analysts today speak so much about. Its capabilities range from nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles to thousands of tanks and artillery pieces, millions of infantrymen, hundreds of aircraft (virtually all obsolete but most in working order) and a special operations command of over 100,000. In the last Korean War, northern forces engaged in guerrilla activities throughout the peninsula. This time, Pyongyang might even resort to terrorist attacks in the United States or along the supply lines from the U.S. homeland to the war zone. This kind of war would be a test of the U.S. military’s ability to deal with a so-called hybrid threat.

If Pyongyang chooses to use nuclear weapons, the Obama Administration’s newly-formulated doctrine on nuclear use would receive its first test. It is not clear what kind of punishment the United States could or should inflict on the North if that regime chooses to employ nuclear weapons against us or our allies. We may well wish that the Obama Administration had not truncated deployment of the National Missile Defense system.

Daniel Goure, Ph.D.

Return to Early Warning Blog
<< Previous
Next >>
1600 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22209
P: 703-522-5828 | F: 703-522-5837
©2009 Lexington Institute. All Rights Reserved.
Website designed by Borcz:Dixon | Powered by Agency of Record