Print
Email
>
>
JSTARS Radar Planes Can't Stay In The Fight Without Better Engines
Tags
2011 budget Acquisition Reform Aegis AEHF Afghan surge Afghanistan AgustaWestland airborne laser Airbus Al Qaeda Allies Alternate Engine Al-Yamamah American Enterprise Institute Ammunition Industrial Base APL Arms Control Arms Sales Arms Transfers Army Arrow Ashton Carter Babcock & Wilcox BAE Systems Bath Iron Works Bechtel BMDR Boeing Brown C-17 C-2 CAPE Carriers CENTCOM CH-47 Chabraja China climate change Cluster Bombs Cluster Munitions Conflicts of Interest Constellation CVN-78 CVN-91 cyber attack cyber defense cyber offense Cyber Threats Cyber Warfare DDG-1000 DDG-51 defense acquisitions Defense Budget Defense Business Board Defense Industry Defense Planning Defense Spending deficit Democrats & Defense deterrence Donald Rumsfeld Dong Feng DRS Technologies EA-18G EADS Efficiency Initiative EFV EH101 energy security Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle Export Controls F-16 F-22 F-35 Finmeccanica FMS FMTV force structure forcible entry Ford class Foreign Military Sales Free Trade Future Combat Systems GBI GCV General Dynamics General Mattis General McChrystal Global Hawk Global Strike GMR Greyhound Ground Combat Vehicle guns versus butter Handheld Manpack Radio Hapag-Looyd Helicopters Heritage Foundation High-Speed Rail Homeland Security Humvee hybrid warfare ICBM Inherently Governmental insourcing Intellectual Property Intelligence Community Iran Iran Sanctions Iraq Israel Jammer JFCOM Joint Forces Command Joint Heavy Lift Joint Operating Environment Joint Stars Joint Strike Fighter JSTARS JTRS KC-45 KC-X Kent Kresa Korea Larry Prior Linda Hudson Littoral Combat Ship Lockheed Martin Logistics Lynn M1 Mabus Maersk ManTech manufacturing Marine Corps Marine One Marinette Massachusetts M-ATV MH-60 Mid-term election Mine Countermeasures Mine Warfare Missile Defense MQ-9 MRAP NASA National Security Strategy NATO Navy NCADE Network-Centric Warfare Next Generation Jammer NGEN Nigeria NII Nimitz class NLOS-LS NMCI Non-Proliferation Norm Dicks North Korea Northrop Grumman NPR Nuclear Power Nuclear Shipbuilding Nuclear strategy Nuclear weapons Nunn-McCurdy O&M Operations and Maintenance Oshkosh Osprey P-8 Partnering Patriot PBL Performance-Based Logistics Persian Gulf Phalanx presidential helicopter Private Contractors Public-Private Partnerships QDR QHSR Rapid Fielding Initiative Ray Mabus Raytheon Rebalancing Reset RIMPAC Robert Gates Rocket Motors Ron Epstein RQ-7 Russia S-300 Samsung SBINet Scan Eagle Secretary Gates Shadow shipbuilding Sikorsky Soft Power solid rocket motor South Korea Space Tracking and Surveillance Satellite Space-X SSBN SSBN(X) Standard Missile Standard Missile 3 START Treaty Strategic Architecture strategic arms control Submarines Super Hornet Sustainable Defense Sustainment Taiwan Taliban Tanker terror terrorism THAAD Trade Deficit Trade Policy Trident Trident submarine UH-60 Unmanned Aerial Systems Unmanned Aerial Vehicles US Ports US101 USS Missouri V-22 Vertical Lift Virginia class weapons spending Wes Bush WGS Wideband Global Satcom William Perry World Trade Organization WTO Yemen
Recent
<< Previous
Next >>

JSTARS Radar Planes Can't Stay In The Fight Without Better Engines


On September 30, Pentagon technology chief Ashton Carter directed the Air Force to fund new jet engines for the Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) fleet. The planes carry a unique radar that can track and image moving ground targets -- some as small as individual terrorists -- over vast areas. It's a unique capability directly relevant to the fight in Southwest Asia, but the Air Force isn't exactly rushing to keep the aircraft operational. First the service shelved upgrades that would have made the radar more agile, then it neglected to obligate money for new engines appropriated by Congress.

Senior Pentagon leaders have repeatedly signaled that the service must keep the JSTARS planes viable. Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Adm. James Cartwright kicked Air Force budgeteers out of his office when they proposed retiring the fleet, and now technology guru Carter is telling them to go find the money for new engines. If the Air Force had obligated money in a timely fashion, the first two sets of engines would be funded, but instead it is asking Congress to make up a shortfall its foot-dragging created, which amounts to seeking money for the same item twice.

This mess doesn't build confidence about the Air Force's commitment to supporting the needs of soldiers, soldiers being the main consumers of JSTAR reconnaissance. But it's more important to get warfighters what they need than to have an inside-the-beltway wrangle over who's to blame for dropping the budgetary ball. Carter needs to hold Air Force feet to the fire on meeting joint surveillance needs, and Congress needs to provide the money necessary to keep the re-engining program going. There are only 17 planes in the JSTARS fleet, but it looks like we're going to have to rely on them for a long time to come, and as of right now not one has the new engines needed to stay viable.

Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D.

Return to Early Warning Blog
<< Previous
Next >>
1600 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22209
P: 703-522-5828 | F: 703-522-5837
©2009 Lexington Institute. All Rights Reserved.
Website designed by Borcz:Dixon | Powered by Agency of Record